| Version 13 (modified by scottmc, 6 years ago) (diff) |
|---|
Porting Tips
Documentation
Some documentation:
- A short but very helpful slideset on porting applications to BeOS by François Revol (mmu_man).
- A comprehensive tutorial on the GNU Autotools
- Autotools - A Guide to autoconf, automake and libtool ebook
The CommonProblems page lists a number of common problems encountered when porting applications to BeOS.
Getting started on Haiku OS
gcc 2.x (default)
When building your own Haiku image, you can add
AddOptionalHaikuImagePackages Development ;
to your build/jam/UserBuildConfig file. This sets up a development environment and unzips a small tree of ready-to-use binary tools onto your image, including a Haiku-specific gcc2, Perl and autotools. Other helpful packages are OpenSSL and the Pe text editor (which allows you to jump to the line of an error message) and Firefox (which allows you to copy-and-paste console output to our Wiki pages).
Most software cannot handle i586-pc-haiku yet, so it is usually necessary to configure with --build=i586-pc-beos, or you can:
cp /boot/common/share/libtool/config/config.* .
Where . is the package root folder, or the folder in which the package has outdated config.guess and/or config.sub files. If trying to build static and shared libraries, you may also need to run (try using ./autogen.sh first if it exists, it usually runs all the autotools as needed):
libtoolize --force --copy aclocal automake autoconf
Which "should" force the Haiku cases into your configure file. You might have to use other options to get aclocal/automake/autoconf to do this successfully.
gcc 4.x
Haiku now has a native GCC4.
gcc 2.x and 4.x hybrid
The following ticket explains how to build a Haiku image that runs both gcc 2.x and 4.x executables.
Porting considerations
To automatically patch software with the BePorter? tool, source tarballs should be diff'ed (cf. CreatePatch).
Most projects however use SCM/VCS software, including CVS, Subversion, Git, Mercurial and Bazaar, and accept patches only against their latest (HEAD/trunk/master) development version. A possible strategy is:
- Download and try the latest released source tarball. If it works, no further steps are necessary.
- Otherwise, check if the project maintains a publicly accessible (anonymous) source code repository. You might be able to choose between a branch corresponding to the version number of the source tarball, or trunk/master. (Terminology varies between the VCS tools.)
Doing so, you can easily track or revert your own changes, and this is the preferred format for submitting patches to the respective projects.
Note that it is not easily automatable for BePorter? though, but once accepted, future source tarballs promise to compile without patching.
Also note that doing so may, depending on the project, result in more dependencies but might be easier to handle, for instance when modifying configure.in or Makefile.am instead of an Autoconf-generated configure or Automake-generated Makefile.
Building to a clean folder and making a binary
Many packages have an option to do a "make install", in many of those cases you can use:
make install DESTDIR=/boot/foo cd /boot/foo/boot zip -ry9 packagename-x.x.x-gccX-haiku-YYYY-MM-DD.zip *
Where x.x.x is the rev of the package, and gccX is gcc2 or gcc4, haiku could also be beos or bone or zeta, YYYY is the 4 digit year, MM is the 2 digit month, DD is the 2 digit day (both zero padded).
